The
problem is not whether or not any group or "class" of
people can be married, marriage is a religious ceremony. The problem
is taxation and government intrusion in personal lives and private
property ownership. Were the government not able to tax any estate or
regulate benefits in the private market this issue would be moot.
Prior to 1913 and passage of the 16th
Amendment there was no federal intrusion in these areas. The people
and the Judiciary of the United States need to abolish the true
problem or it will continue to resurface in other areas with a
different face but the same root cause ... Government intrusion due
to oppressive taxation. In order to accomplish this
radical correction to the founding principles it becomes necessary to
recognize that the national and international progressive movement
has been successful at changing the narrative by appealing to
fractured special interests in order to distract the populous from
a justifiable revolt of their needless taxation and other forms of
oppression.
Whether or not the
Supreme Court rules in favor of Gay Marriage or the Defense of
Marriage Act is truly irrelevant. Until the Judiciary serves their
intended purpose to check the excessive power of the Executive branch
of government we will continue to have the distractions that tie up
the courts and further fracture the people of the United States.
I have a simple question to ask Rep Rangel, Sen. Feinstein, Sen. Reid, President Obama, and any others engaged in circumventing the United States Constitution:
Were the Cambodians better off after Pol-Pot disarmed them?
Were the German people better off after being disarmed by the Nazi's?
Were the Russian people better off after being disarmed by the Soviet Union?
How about the Chinese people after being disarmed by Chairman Mao?
The only people that would be better off in the United States if it's citizen's were disarmed would be the criminals. There are enough laws on the books to effectively disarm the criminals without disarming or even limiting the rights of lawful citizens. So what is the real motive here?
Monday, March 4, 2013
There is really nothing more that needs to be said once one reads this in light of the Constitution of The United States of America.
‘Obama DHS’ Buys 2,717 Light-Armored Tanks…
881
EmailShare
To Go With Their 1.6 Billion Bullet Stockpile
(The Gateway Pundit/ Modern Survival) – This is getting a little creepy.
According Modern Survival The Department of Homeland Security (through the U.S. Army Forces Command) recently retrofitted 2,717 of these ‘Mine Resistant Protected’ vehicles for service on the streets of the United States.
Although I’ve seen and read several online blurbs about this vehicle of late, I decided to dig slightly deeper and discover more about the vehicle itself.
DHS even released a video on their newly purchased MRAPs.
The MRAP featured in this video is was in Albuquerque, New Mexico for Law Enforcement Day which was held at a local area Target Store. This MRAP is stationed in El Paso, Texas at The Homeland Security Investigations Office. MRAP is a Mine Resistant Armor Protected Vehicle.
The new DHS sanctioned ‘Street Sweeper’ (my own slang due to the gun ports) is built by Navistar Defense (NavistarDefense.com), a division within the Navistar organization. Under the Navistar umbrella are several other companies including International Trucks, IC Bus (they make school buses), Monaco RV (recreational vehicles), WorkHorse (they make chassis), MaxxForce (diesel engines), and Navistar Financial (the money arm of the company).
———————- From Navistar Defense:
The International® MaxxPro® is Navistar Defense’s Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicle and incorporates the latest design in armoring technology. Extensively tested by the military and used in theater today, the MaxxPro features a V-shaped hull and other design features that greatly improve survivability. With so much protection, it’s the vehicle that every crew wants when they’re out in the field.
The MaxxPro MRAP is built to withstand ballistic arms fire, mine blasts, IEDs, and other emerging threats. Its V-shaped hull helps deflect blasts out and away from the crew and its armoring can be customized to meet any mission requirement.
———————-
The installation contract retrofits 2,717 vintage MaxxPro vehicles (work performed in West Point, Mississippi) with a new rolling chassis. This chassis enhancement included the addition of the DXM™ independent suspension, a MaxxForce® 9.3 engine, and a 570 amp alternator and driveline. The work was completed at the end of May 2012.
Observations and Questions:
Why would DHS need such over-the-top vehicles on U.S. streets to withstand IEDs and mine blasts?
There are rails along the perimeter windows/gun ports to help displace the impact of RPG rounds… seems a bit much for a Police/Rescue vehicle…
They all have gun ports… Rescue vehicle?
Seriously, why would DHS need such a vehicle on our streets? What are they expecting or preparing for? It is a ridiculous over-the-top display of force that is meant to intimidate and associate the DHS name and logo with ‘FEAR’. Just like all that’s happening with the TSA (under the wing of DHS), this is about normalization of a new way of American life.
By the way, you’re the one who paid for these. Or better said… your grand-kids will pay for these since we are living on a negative balance sheet with a 16 Trillion dollar deficit.
I am curious to know if any of our MSB readers have seen any of these vehicles? Send photos and encounters if you have them…
George Washington once said, “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force; like fire, a troublesome servant and a fearful master. Never for a moment should it be left to irresponsible action.”
One reader has suggested that the DHS vehicles are not Navistar MaxxPro, but Golan (Israeli made) armored vehicles, while another reader who apparently has worked for Navistar confirms that this vehicle is indeed made by Navistar. There have been numerous reports on this story swirling within the blogosphere with varying claims of make and model. While this new information may or may not be accurate, I still question the need for these types of military armored vehicles riding on the ‘free’ streets of America, regardless of who makes them.
These mods are for the “vehicle reset line”, meaning, for those that are or have apparently come home from overseas. Where are they exactly being deployed? It is difficult to say, because they have not exactly said. There are pictures out there with Homeland Security printed on the sides of these vehicles. There are reports that some of them are being purposed for Border Patrol. There are personal accounts of seeing the vehicles elsewhere. The DoD and DHS have an apparent working relationship, and these returning MRAP’s are apparently being re-purposed here on American streets. On the one hand it sounds frugal, on the other it sounds unnecessary (with exception to border patrol IMHO). One could argue that we might simply mothball them until such time they’re needed again (although understandably, decay would set in – it’s cost versus reward).
The DHS and DoD report up the Executive branch to the Commander in Chief. The DoD / military is primarily limited to overseas actions due to the Posse Comitatus Act, while the new DHS (thanks to the Patriot Act after 9/11) is intended for operations on U.S. soil. The DHS is seemingly becoming the ‘legalized’ military here at home… and one could argue that it may be circumventing the Posse Comitatus Act to some degree.